Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. McDonald
as 2:2009cv02967
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Smith
Respondent:
M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Smith v. Philip Vasquez
as 09-35870
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILIP VASQUEZ, Warden
U.S. Small Business Administration v. Propper et al
as 3:2009mc00504
Defendant:
Richard D. Propper, Acorn Connecticut Investments, L.P., Kerry S Propper and others
Receiver:
U.S. Small Business Administration
Plaintiff:
Acorn Technology Fund, L.P.
United States Small Business Administration v. Propper et al
as 2:2009mc00068
Plaintiff:
United States Small Business Administration
Defendant:
Richard D. Propper, Acorn Connecticut Investments, L.P., Kerry S. Propper and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Charles Earl Smith v. J. Salazar
as 2:2008cv06183
Petitioner:
Charles Earl Smith
Respondent:
J. Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alliance Transcription Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01464
Defendant:
Alliance Transcription Services, Inc., Clifford A Lewis, Richard A Dabney and others
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Smith v. Vasquez
as 1:2008cv00258
Petitioner:
Charles E Smith
Respondent:
Philip Vasquez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Phalen
as 1:2007cv01891
Plaintiff:
Charles L Smith
Defendant:
Phalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olivo v. Reece et al
as 2:2007cv02452
Plaintiff:
Augustine Olivo
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles L. Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
