Cases 1 - 10 of 57
SMITH et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv02967
Plaintiff:
NADINE Y. SMITH and CHARLES L. SMITH, III
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. MOSER et al
as 3:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Dauphin County Domestics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv01241
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Swatara Township Police Department and Dauphin County Booking Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clark and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2017cv02339
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
