Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Anderson v. Timme et al
as 1:2010cv02675
Petitioner:
Daniel Charles Anderson
Respondent:
Rae Timme and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Timberlake
as 3:2010cv00092
Petitioner:
Charles Anderson
Respondent:
Karen Timberlake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Anderson v. Debra Dexter
as 09-57062
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBRA DEXTER, Warden
Gunn v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv00934
Petitioner:
Charles Anderson Gunn
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Everett Hadix, et al v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 09-2255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT HADIX, RICHARD MAPES, PATRICK C. SOMMERVILLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, ROBERT BROWN, JR., PAMELA WITHROW and others
Everett Hadix, et al v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 09-1424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETT HADIX, RICHARD MAPES, PATRICK C. SOMMERVILLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, ROBERT BROWN, JR., PAMELA WITHROW and others
Phillips et al v. Boone County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv04253
Plaintiff:
Mark Phillips, David McClain and Ansur P. Adams
Defendant:
Boone County Jail, Dwayne Carey, Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. BERKE et al
as 3:2008cv04619
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANDERSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY BERKE, D.J. UNGER and JEFF HETRICKS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2008cv00093
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jarvis et al v. Nye County Detention et al
as 2:2008cv00470
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Jarvis, Charles Anderson, Charles Finch and others
Defendant:
Nye County Detention, Sgt. Martinez and Arms
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
