Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Burrell v. Myers et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Burrell
Defendant:
Robert Lee Myers, III, Allon Devon White, Tameka Maria Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hollman v. TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc et al
as 6:2010cv00685
Plaintiff:
John Hollman
Defendant:
TLC The Laser Eye Center Institute Inc, TLC The Laser Center Carolina Inc, TLC The Laser Center Madison Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Nabaya v. Trible et al
as 3:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya
Defendant:
Peter Trible, Frank L. Benser, William Boice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Crim et al v. Conagra Foods Inc
as 0:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Brenda Crim, Brenda Crim, Charles Davis and others
Defendant:
Conagra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Yaratha et al
as 2:2008cv00342
Plaintiff:
Anthony Turner
Defendant:
Dr. S. Yaratha, Charles Davis and James S. Reinhard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BURRELL v. COUNTY OF HENRICO, VIRGINIA et al
as 3:2007cv00456
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Burrell
Defendant:
County of Henrico, Virginia, County of Henrico, Virginia, T. M. Alphin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Davis v. MDS Inc et al
as 3:2007cv02053
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis
Defendant:
MDS Inc, MDS Inc, MDS Nordion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Burrell v. County of Henrico, Virginia et al
as 3:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Burrell
Defendant:
County of Henrico, Virginia, County of Henrico, Virginia, County of Henrico, Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Bowman v. Washington et al
as 2:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Bowman
Defendant:
James Washington, Lt. Reme Rodriquez and Lt. S. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
