Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DOOLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dooley v Dougherty et al
as 4:2016cv04086
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Daniel Dougherty, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Dooley v. Jason Chenoweth, et al
as 16-1626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JASON CHENOWETH, Security Therapy Aid 1 and MICHAEL TEEL
Charles Dooley v. Kevin Winters, et al
as 15-2703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DOOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN WINTERS, WANDA PENNOCK, AMY CLARK and others
Marion Horn v. William Ostendorf, et al
as 15-2158
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Horn
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marion Horn
Defendant:
St. Louis County, St. Louis County Police Department, Charles Dooley, County Executive and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Ostendorf, Lt. - DSN 1846, Robert Shelvy, Sargeant - DSN 0897, Joshua Lawrence, Police Officer - DSN 2022 and others
Dooley v. Winters et al
as 3:2015cv03100
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Kevin Winters, Wanda Pennock, Amy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Chenoweth et al
as 3:2013cv03301
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Jason Chenoweth, James C Clayton, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Davis v. St. Louis County, et al
as 12-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis County, Charles Dooley, Julia Childrey and others
Dooley v. Kibby et al
as 3:2012cv03006
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Alfreda Kibby, Eugene McAdory, Jr, James Haage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Dredge et al
as 3:2011cv03194
Plaintiff:
Charles Dooley
Defendant:
Steve Dredge, Sandra Simpson, Alfreda Kibby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
