Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Doyle v. Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company
as 2:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Charles Doyle
Defendant:
Rotor X Aircraft Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Doyle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05265
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03465
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Doyle and Charles Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Charles Doyle, Jr., et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90062
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CHARLES DOYLE, JR., ELVIS GARRICK, ORETHA GARRICK and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Doyle et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00687
Plaintiff:
Charles Doyle, Jr , Elvis Garrick , Oretha Garrick and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bader et al v. Airline Pilots Association, International
as 1:2014cv06415
Defendant:
Air Line Pilots Association International
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bader , Charles Doyle and Ralph Rina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
BADER et al v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
as 1:2014cv00575
Defendant:
AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS BADER , CHARLES DOYLE and RALPH RINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Doyle v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2010cv00296
Plaintiff:
Randall Charles Doyle
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Trant, Daniel Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
