Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SWEENEY v. WARDEN
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SWEENEY v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Respondent: DANNY MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Gladieux et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00345
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Thomas
Defendant: David J. Gladieux, Thomas C. Henry, Allen County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWEENEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00330
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANE v. KING
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant: TONY KING
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SHANE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane v. King
as 3:2021cv00385
Defendant: Tony King
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Shane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. KRAMER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00156
Defendant: CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA and HAROLD D. KRAMER
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEENEY v. VANDERHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00463
Respondent: FRANK VANDERHILL
Petitioner: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWEENEY v. SWEENEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00289
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant: KATHLEEN M. SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gould, Jr. v. Clark, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00446
Defendant: Justin Clark, Nicholas Todd Wardrip and Francisco Carrillo
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Gould, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?