Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harper v. Barbosa et al
as 1:2021cv03951
Plaintiff: Charles Harper
Defendant: Tonitia Sunni Barbosa, GodlyGirl Entertainment, Jeff Bezos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Charles Harper v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15394
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES HARPER
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harper v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02090
Petitioner: Charles Harper
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Charles Harper
as 16-12451
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES HARPER
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Charles Harper
as 15-15103
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES HARPER
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harris v. Doyle et al
as 1:2013cv00290
Plaintiff: Mark Chapman Harris
Defendant: Charles Harper
Counter_claimant: Charles Harper
Counter_defendant: Mark Chapman Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Harper et al
as 1:2012cv02730
Plaintiff: Mark Chapman Harris
Defendant: Charles Harper, John Doyle , Jermome Babbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Quattlebaum et al (Dale County CA # CV-2011-89)
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff: Lorenzo Pearson
Defendant: Kenneth Quattlebaum, Robert H. Brogden, Brogden Law Firm LLC and others
Movant: Clarissa Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson-Harper v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2009cv00121
Plaintiff: Alice Lawson-Harper, Alice Lawson-Harper, Charles Harper and others
Defendant: Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca LP, Astrazeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?