Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Sivak v. Ramirez, et al.
as 24-2395
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
RAMIREZ, Sergeant, ISCI, AARON FODGE, Prison Employee, R. FINDEISEN, Prison Employee and others
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19704
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10448
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Kopp et al
as 1:2019cv00424
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Jones and Rosalyn Alyssa Rodriguez
Defendant:
James Floyd, Governor Lawrence T. Hogan, Nancy K. Kopp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Law et al v. Fairfax, The Town of et al
as 1:2015cv03309
Plaintiff:
Charles Law, Sr and Betty J Law
Defendant:
Fairfax, The Town of , John Doe and J Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Resh, et al v. China Agritech, Inc., et al
as 15-55432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL H. RESH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM SCHOENKE, HEROCA HOLDING, B.V. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHINA AGRITECH, INC., YU CHANG, Company,'s CEO, President, Secretary and , Chairman of the Board, YAU-SING TANG, Company's Chief Financial Officer, AKA Gareth Tang and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
