Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MEYERS et al v. MAY et al
as 5:2020cv01781
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (11-20), GEORGINE MAY, JOHN DOE (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
MARY MEYERS and CHARLES MEYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. MEYER
as 2:2019cv12050
Plaintiff:
NEIL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD CHARLES MEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYERS et al v. DEAN TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04942
Plaintiff:
DONNA MEYERS and CHARLES MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN TRANSPORTATION, INC. and TUSCAN/LEHIGH DAIRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sami Al-Shahin v. DHS, et al
as 10-4292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMI AL-SHAHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DHS/ICE, US IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, EDWARD J. MCELROY, ICE DISTRICT DIRECTOR and others
ESTATE OF JESSE M. RIVERA et al v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv05218
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JESSE M. RIVERA, NYDIA E. RIVERA and EUGENIO RIVERA
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, PASSAIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JERRY SPEZIALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
APONTE et al v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2009cv03206
Plaintiff:
SONIA APONTE and SONIA APONTE
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, PASSAIC COUNTY JAIL, JERRY SPEZIALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEVY v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC et al
as 2:2009cv01191
Plaintiff:
MARISA LEVY
Defendant:
BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF PASSAIC, PASSAIC COUNTY JAIL, CHARLES MEYERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURRAY v. MEYERS
as 2:2009cv00958
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTHONY MURRAY
Defendant:
CHARLES MEYERS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HILL v. MEYERS
as 2:2008cv06283
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HILL
Defendant:
CHARLES MEYERS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
