Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Payne v. City of Houston, Texas
as 24-20150
Plaintiff:
Harriet Payne, Charles Payne, Jr., Cavin Payne and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
USA v. David Somerville
as 24-1571
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ANTHONY SOMERVILLE, also known as Charles Payne also known as Midnite
Payne et al v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv04686
Plaintiff:
Harriet Payne, Charles Payne, Jr., Cavin Payne and others
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas and Christopher Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09686
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAYNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Payne v. State of Texas
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Charles Payne
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66540
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAYNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16956
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Philip A. Bralich
as 21-904
Respondent:
Michael Bralich, Charles Payne, Ronna McDaniel, Chairwoman, Republican National Committee and others
Petitioner:
Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D
Bralich v. Fox News Network, LLC.
as 21-884
Defendant / Appellee:
Newt Gingrich, Geraldo Rivera, Paul McKintrick and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D and Philip Andrew Bralich, Ph.D
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Republican National Party and Greg Gutfeld
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAY CHARLES PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
