Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Burks v. First Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Deshunski D Burks
Defendant:
First Judicial District Court, Circuit Courts of Appeal, Louisiana State Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Loftin et al
as 5:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
Jack King
Defendant:
Gary Loftin and Charles R Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Scott et al
as 5:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Dion Lewis
Defendant:
Charles R Scott and Gary Loftin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as MN/0:16-cv-02265
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Scott and Sandra Scott
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Lester v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2015cv02008
Plaintiff:
James Hayward Lester
Defendant:
District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish, Charles R Scott, Dale Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ford
Defendant:
District Attorney Caddo Parish , Paul Carmouche , Charles R Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Top Dollar Pawn, Gun, & Car v. Caddo Parish, et al
as 14-31178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOP DOLLAR PAWN, GUN, & CAR AUDIO #5, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
CADDO PARISH, WILLIE L. SHAW, JR., in his official capacity as Chief of Police, STEVE PRATOR, in his official capacity as Sheriff and others
Johnson v. Scott et al
as 5:2014cv02262
Defendant:
Charles R Scott, Suzanne M Owens, James Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Jerrod D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulrich v. Scott et al
as 5:2014cv00037
Defendant:
Charles R Scott, Kenya Ellis, Jordan Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Hahmer Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Center for Individual Freedom v. Charles Scott, et al
as 13-31273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES R. SCOTT, M. BLANK MONROSE, SCOTT SCHNEIDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
