Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Spikes et al v. The Builder, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Victor Spikes, Jr. and Victor Spikes
Defendant:
Charles Ray Beard and The Builder, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Abernathy v. Becon Construction Company, Inc
as 1:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Mary Annette Abernathy , All Plaintiffs , Isidora Abreu Ventura and others
Defendant:
Becon Construction Company, Inc, Valente Zarraga and Kenneth Ray Zeno
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Milton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hallman et al v. Cassady & Self Glass Co Inc
as 2:2014cv00814
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Hallman and Charles Ray
Defendant:
Cassady & Self Glass Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shuler et al v. R. Contruction Company et al
as 5:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Christopher Evans, Andres J. Herrera, Richard Johnson and others
Defendant:
R. Contruction Company and Joey Rodell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bowman et al v. Turner Industries Group LLC
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Loyd Bowman , All Plaintiffs , Demetrius Joseph Braud and others
Defendant:
Turner Industries Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stanley v. CAR-BER Testing Texas, LLC
as 1:2013cv00374
Consolidated Plaintiff:
George Robert Campbell, Tavis Pillsbury, Alan Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Enloe, Shane Tamez, Charles Ray Black and others
Defendant:
CAR-BER Testing Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King v. Detroit Diesel Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv11895
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray King
Defendant:
Detroit Diesel Corporation and UAW Local 163
Anderson v. Peterman Door & Hardware et al
as 4:2008cv00751
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Anderson and Charles Ray Anderson
Defendant:
Peterman Door & Hardware and Pierre Peterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cooper v. Standard Insurance Company
as 7:2007cv02446
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Cooper
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
