Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Washington v. Maskel et al
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Darnell Washington
Defendant:
Kevin Maskel, Colby Roberson, Charles Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv18302
Petitioner:
CHARLES RODRIGUEZ and JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv17229
Petitioner:
CHARLES RODRIGUEZ, JOESEPH RODRIGUEZ and JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez v. Rodriguez
as 17-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant - Appellee:
Sgt. Charles Rodriguez, #1502, P.O. Randy Torres, P.O. Vincent Pomponio, #3419 and others
Joseph Rodriguez, et al v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 15-3555
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ and CHARLES RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Joseph Rodriguez, et al v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 15-3570
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ and CHARLES RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RODRIGUEZ v. JONES et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Petitioner:
JERRY CHARLES RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2014cv01121
Petitioner:
Joseph Rodriguez and Charles Rodriguez
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2013cv09162
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
Charles Rodriguez, Randy Torres, Vincent Pomponio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2013cv03832
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
Charles Rodriguez, Randy Torres, Vincent Pomponio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
