Cases 1 - 10 of 43
McMillen v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Shannon McMillen
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Charles Smith, City of Bullhead City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodrigues, et al. v. General Motors LLC
as 24-1945
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE RODRIGUES and CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Rodrigues et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv04488
Plaintiff:
Annette Rodrigues and Charles Smith
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-3034
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM HUTCHINGS
Rodrick C. Smith v. L. Vaca et al
as 2:2022cv05489
Plaintiff:
Rodrick C. Smith and Rodrick Charles Smith
Defendant:
L. Vaca, J. Anderson and M. Rosales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Kennedy, et al v. First National Bank of Norther, et al
as 21-16190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. KENNEDY
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL E. GOLDSTEIN, CHARLES SMITH, PAUL J. STEINER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, NEXGEN BUILDERS, INC., FRED HJELMESET and others
Smith v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv01781
Respondent:
Nevada Department of Corrections, William Hutching and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01658
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019at00848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
