Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Curry v. MacDougall Corr. Inst et al
as 0:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
MacDougall Corr. Inst, Lee Correctional Institution, Ridgeland Corr. Inst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 14-7645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS, CITY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS and others
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 14-6159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, #950R1005342; Claim Date 10-29-10; Judge Garfinkel, seal on 10-29-10, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS, PEOPLE OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS and others
Odom v. South Carolina, State of
as 5:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, State of South Carolina Taxpayers, People of Charleston Taxpayers and others
Consol_counter_defendant:
SCDMH Health Care Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The et al
as 2:2010cv02303
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
Ninth Judical Circuit Court, The, R Markley Dennis, Jr, Charleston County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Samuel v. Lori Proctor
as 08-7233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC SAMUEL
Defendant - Appellee:
LORI D. PROCTOR, Public Defender, BOYD YOUNG, Public Defender of the Charleston County Public Defender's Office and CHARLESTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Samuel v. Proctor et al
as 2:2007cv01586
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel
Defendant:
Lori D Proctor, Boyd Young and Charleston County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Samuel v. Proctor et al
as 3:2007cv01586
Plaintiff:
Eric Samuel
Defendant:
Lori D Proctor, Boyd Young and Charleston County Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
