Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
USA v. Charlie Williams
as 24-10431
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHARLIE WILLIAMS
Charlie Williams v. USA
as 23-12415
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLIE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff: TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant: ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01541
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Williams v. Does We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01281
Plaintiff: Charlie Williams
Defendant: John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Barnett et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff: Charlie William Parker
Defendant: Officer Unknown Barnett, Officer 31 and Officer J 6
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10769
Plaintiff: CHARLIE WILLIAMS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
903 West Washington LLC et al v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv11110
Plaintiff: 903 West Washington LLC, 207 Second Street LLC and 321 West Mason LLC
Defendant: City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, MARK M. PORTERFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?