Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clark v. Headley et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cordell Clark
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Charles McKee, Charmelle Luckie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Curtis Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Montrez Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00830
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Department of Corrections Personal Board Director and others
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00832
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Clay Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, City, County, Commission of Elmore County, Alabama, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Holliman, Richard Clay Martin, Aloysius Thaddeus Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karious Bell v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 14-13310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARIOUS N. BELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN, SIMONE MCNABB, COI Officer and others
Bell v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
Karious N. Bell
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Leon Forniss, Simone McNabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv01222
Plaintiff:
Karious N Bell
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Leon Forniss, Simone McNabb and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
