Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
L A Printex Industries Inc v. Outlet Division Store Company et al
as 2:2013cv00897
Defendant:
Charming Shoppes Inc, Does, Lane Bryant Inc and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Geotag, Inc. v. Charming Shoppes Inc.
as 2:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Geotag, Inc.
Defendant:
Charming Shoppes Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Charming Shoppes Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Geotag, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
NADLER v. CHARMING SHOPPES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02838
Plaintiff:
JUDITH KAYE NADLER
Defendant:
CHARMING SHOPPES, INC., MICHAEL GOLDSTEIN, KATHERINE M. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lodsys Group, LLC v. Becker Professional Development Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00286
Plaintiff:
Lodsys Group, LLC
Defendant:
Becker Professional Development Corporation , Cabela's, Inc. , Charming Shoppes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alexis Johnson v. Lane Bryant Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02504
Defendant:
Charming Shoppes Inc, Does, Lane Bryant Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Johnson
Garcia v. Lane Bryant, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01566
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garcia
Defendant:
Lane Bryant, Inc. and Charming Shoppes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Lane Bryant, Inc. et al
as 1:2011at00592
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Garcia
Defendant:
Lane Bryant, Inc. and Charming Shoppes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Select Retrieval LLC v. Ann Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00812
Plaintiff:
Select Retrieval LLC
Defendant:
Amerimark Direct LLC, Ann Inc., Babyage.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
