Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Casanova v. Willow Bend Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Neisy Casanova
Defendant:
Willow Bend Mortgage Company, Craig Schrank, National City Mortgage Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Strege v. Charles Schwab et al
as 3:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Uranium One, Energy Fuels and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brouchet v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv05612
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dean Brouchet
Defendant:
TX Attorney General and Chase Bank Lake Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 22-30611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Deon Morris, L.L.P.
Jemison v. IL Dept of Health
as 22-20114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
George Jemison
Defendant / Appellee:
Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, Illinois Secretary of State, Comptroller State of Illinois and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
