Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Andrews et al v. EnPro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00201
Plaintiff:
Odester Andrews, Brenda Annette Armstrong, Dorothy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
EnPro Industries, Inc., EnPro Holdings, Inc., Italmatch USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maurice Groulx, et alIn re: Maurice Groulx, et al
as 26-12023
Petitioner:
In re: MAURICE GROULX and CHAUNCY RICHARD
Respondent:
EMBRACE HOME LOANS, INC., LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, LOANCARE, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-10505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Pizarro Campos (Thomas)
as 26-1055
Defendant:
ANDRES J. PIZARRO CAMPOS, EDWARD E. LEEPER, JR., JAQUEZ L. THOMAS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anaheim Gardens, L.P. v. US
as 26-1489
Plaintiff:
METRO WEST LIMITED, L.P., 5324 FOOTHILL APARTMENTS, G.P., 3740 SILVERLAKE VILLAGE, L.P. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Chauncy Richard, et al v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 26-10530
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCY RICHARD and MAURICE GROULX
Defendant:
EMBRACE HOME LOANS, INC., LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, JOEL L. GOLDMAN and others
Chauncy Richard, et al v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc., et al
as 26-10505
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCY RICHARD and MAURICE GROULX
Defendant:
EMBRACE HOME LOANS, INC., LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, JOEL L. GOLDMAN and others
US v. Chauncy Morst
as 26-4072
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHAUNCY MORST, a/k/a Tone
Richard et al v. Embrace Home Loans, Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2026cv00055
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard and Maurice Groulx
Defendant:
Embrace Home Loans, Inc., Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC, LoanCare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Walton v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00001
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCY TYRONE WALTON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
