Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Akins et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv16059
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lipman, Irma Ochoteco, GAIL WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., PTI Union, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akins et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv01912
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lipman, Irma Ochoteco, Gail Williams and others
Defendant:
PTI Union, LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al
as NV/2:15-cv-00317
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Howell , Kevin Sparta and Jesus D. Diaz
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co. , Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D" , Kinder Morgan GP, Inc. and others
Howell v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jesus D. Diaz, Cheryl A Howell and Kevin Sparta
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan GP, Inc., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D", SFPP, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Howell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21184
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Zane Howell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv03334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv02437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
