Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Broussard v. United Nations et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brooke Marie Broussard Diplomat doing business as Infinite Light, LLC
Defendant:
United Nations, Mr. Stephen Mathias, Cheung Kong Hutchinson Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Cheung v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Cheung
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Robert Lindblad v. Carlos Bolanos, et al
as 22-16200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICHAEL LINDBLAD
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS G. BOLANOS, Chief, ANDREW CONSTENTINO, Officer, JIMMY CHUNG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
James Cheung v. South Pasadena et al
as 2:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
James Cheung
Defendant:
South Pasadena, David G. Watkins, Angelica Frausto-Lupo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
