Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Daniels v. Noyola et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Steven Philip Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Anna Noyola, Adam Likens, Loretta Coopage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Noyola et al
as 6:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Steven Philip Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Anna Noyola, Adam Likens, Loretta Coopage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 6:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell et al v. Sanilac, County of et al
as 2:2014cv13134
Plaintiff:
Deborah K Russell, RQ, JQ and others
Defendant:
Sanilac, County of, Sanilac Department of Human Services, Sanilac Department of Child Protective Services and others
Thomas v. Department of Human Services, et al.
as 2:2014mc50840
Plaintiff:
Elaina Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Human Services and Child Protective Services
Ragan v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Teddy Ragan
Defendant:
State of Texas, Child Protection Services, Metro Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert et al v. Kentucky Child Protective Services et al
as 3:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Gilbert and Sonja Gilbert-McDaniel
Defendant:
Kentucky Child Protective Services and Shaniqua Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Michigan Department of Human Services Child Protective Services
as 2:2013cv14364
Plaintiff:
Elaina Thomas
Defendant:
State of Michigan Department of Human Services Child Protective Services
Hopson v. Briesher et al
as 3:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Dendre Hopson
Defendant:
Steve Briesher, Ron Smith, Kentucky Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
