Cases 1 - 9 of 9
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Top Floor Home Improvements v. Panasonic Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv03907
Plaintiff:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Industrial Devices Sales Company of America and others
Miscellaneou:
Chip-Tech Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Chip-Tech, Ltd. v. AVX Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv03868
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Defendant:
AVX Corporation, KEMET Corporation, KEMET Electronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Microsystems Development Technologies, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation et al
as 5:2015cv03820
Plaintiff:
Microsystems Development Technologies, Inc. and Nebraska Dynamics, Inc.
Defendant:
Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America , Panasonic Industrial Devices Sales Company of America and others
Miscellaneou:
Chip-Tech Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Satoshi Okubo
Respondent:
Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party:
Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Microsemi Corporation v. Chip-Tech, LTD et al
as 8:2008cv00780
Plaintiff:
Microsemi Corporation and Microsemi Corporation
Defendant:
Chip-Tech, LTD and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Chip-Tech, Ltd v. Microsemi Corporatioon
as 2:2007cv00165
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd
Defendant:
Microsemi Corporatioon and Microsemi Corporatioon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Chip-Tech, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Chip-Tech, Ltd. and Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
