Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pusha v. Piazza et al
as 6:2019cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Pusha
Defendant:
Judge Chris Piazza and Prosecutor Ashley Cavdel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pusha v. Piazza et al
as 4:2019cv00259
Plaintiff:
Michael Pusha
Defendant:
Ashley Cavdel and Chris Piazza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pusha v. Piazza et al
as 4:2018cv00719
Plaintiff:
Michael Pusha
Defendant:
Kent Krause, Ashley Caudel, Chris Piazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dexter Harmon v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 16-3579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dexter Harmon
Defendant - Appellee:
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General, State of Arkansas, Bourgon B. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, State of Arkansas, Chris Piazza, Circuit Court Judge, Pulaski County and others
Terrick Nooner v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 16-3157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner
Defendant - Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Governor of Arkansas, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Attorney and others
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 5:2016cv05142
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelly, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Terrick T Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Rutledge et al
as 4:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Dexter Harmon
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge, Bourgon B Reynolds, Chris Piazza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. MAHFOUZ et al
as 1:2015cv00407
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT ELLIS BROOKS
Defendant:
NGA MAHFOUZ, MARY MCGOWAN, CHRIS PIAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Beebe et al
as 4:2013cv00728
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ellis Brooks
Defendant:
Mike Beebe , Tim D Fox , Chris Piazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
