Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. City of Eugene, et al.
as 23-4160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKIE A. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EUGENE, EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Det. ANNE MCINTYRE and others
Johnson v. McAlester Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Dondre C. Johnson
Defendant:
McAlester Police Department and Chris Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howanietz v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Howanietz
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Sarah Medary, William Solesbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv01803
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliard v. Lumme
as 21-50339
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith Downs, DFPS Attorney, Leslie Sims, Christina Fuller and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adrian Cotterll Gilliard
Mihalich v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Officer David Clark, City of Eugene, Officer Tyler Tremain and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel M. Mihalich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Gill et al
as 6:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Richard Fredricks, Gregory Magnus, Incorporated City of Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Alexi Elias Ghenatos, Christina Chapman, Amanda Dupray-Raley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
