Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Poelmann v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
Coen Poelmann
Defendant:
Officer Andrew Roberts, Officer Ian Aarts, Chief Chris Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. City of McAlester et al
as 6:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Dondre C. Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Skinner and McAlester, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff:
HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant:
SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Miller v. City of Eugene, et al.
as 23-4160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKIE A. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EUGENE, EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Det. ANNE MCINTYRE and others
Johnson v. McAlester Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Dondre C. Johnson
Defendant:
McAlester Police Department and Chris Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howanietz v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Howanietz
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Sarah Medary, William Solesbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv01803
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliard v. Lumme
as 21-50339
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith Downs, DFPS Attorney, Leslie Sims, Christina Fuller and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adrian Cotterll Gilliard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
