Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bright v. Wood
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Rickey Bright
Respondent:
Chris Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery
as 24-10111
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Principle Agent in the State of Texas, Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Williams v. Woods
as 3:2023cv00529
Petitioner:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Woods
as 5:2023hc02183
Petitioner:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welsh v. Woods
as 22-10332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant / Appellee:
Chris Woods, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Dustin Tijerina, Individually as Security at T.C.C.C. for C.C.R.S. and Kevin Tedder, Individually as Security at T.C.C.C. for C.C.R.S.
Moorehead v. Woods
as 5:2020ct03145
Defendant:
Chris Woods
Plaintiff:
Jackie Emmitt Moorehead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sevilla-Briones v. Woods
as 3:2019cv00047
Petitioner:
Jimmy Sevilla-Briones
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sevilla-Briones v. Woods
as 5:2019hc02037
Petitioner:
Jimmy Sevilla-Briones
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Cooper et al
as 5:2019ct03029
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, Kenneth E. Lassiter and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOTEN v. WOODS
as 1:2019cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Jerome Wooten
Respondent:
Chris Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
