Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JONES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv04861
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04644
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER-LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04688
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2023cv04343
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Tierney et al
as 2:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Jones
Defendant:
Brenda Tiernev, Larry Hastings, Suzanne Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc., Wesley Thomas Gillespie and Christopher Paul Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv05097
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Jones, Jr and Christopher Jones
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Agencies, Orleans Parish District Attorney, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Jacksonville, Florida et al
as 3:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Rashaud Van Martin
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Christopher H Jones, J. P. Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 1:2021cv01479
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
