Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LeMay v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01424
Plaintiff:
Kareem LeMay
Defendant:
United States of America, Micheal Maffei, Derrick Acker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Burns v. Rovella
as 21-2588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Burns
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Rovella, Commissioner, Dora B. Schriro, Commissioner, Stavros J. Mellekas, Colonel and others
Defendant:
George Battle, Michael B. Darcy, Jay Delgrosso and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00553
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. City of Utica
as 14-706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Julianne Burns and Christopher Burns
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Utica, Linda Fatata, Ind. and as City of Utica Coporation Counsel, Michael Knapp, Ind. and as a Firefighter Employed by the City of Utica Fire Department and others
Burns et al v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2012cv01741
Plaintiff:
Julianne Burns and Christopher Burns
Defendant:
City of Utica , Armond Festine , Linda Fatata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Fumarola
as 1:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burns
Defendant:
Jamie Fumarola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay v. Burns et al
as 3:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Jay
Defendant:
Christopher Burns and Christopher Olsen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wirt v. Human et al
as 6:2007cv06640
Plaintiff:
Quandrell Wirt
Defendant:
Max Human, Ronald Clark, James Hosking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
