Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McClure v. Lumpkin
as 26-40194
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Warden Carter, Todd Allen and others
Snellings v. United States Of America et al
as 2:2026cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Snellings
Defendant:
United States Of America, TDCJ State of Texas, Jay Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2025cv06364
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CARTER
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Kendrick v. Carter
as 25-40691
Plaintiff:
John W. Kendrick
Defendant:
Christopher Carter, Warden II, Stiles Unit, Jerry Bordelon, Schuyler Levias and others
Barroso v. State of Texas
as 25-40658
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, American Correctional Association and others
Gamez v. TDCJ et al
as 4:2025cv03446
Plaintiff:
Marvin Gamez
Defendant:
TDCJ, Bryan Collier, U.T.M.B Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barroso v. State of Texas
as 25-40296
Plaintiff:
Richard Barroso
Defendant:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, American Correctional Association and others
ADAMS et al v. TOWN OF BROWNSBURG, INDIANA
as 1:2025cv00867
Plaintiff:
RYAN ADAMS, JACOB ALVAREZ, AARON ATHERTON and others
Defendant:
TOWN OF BROWNSBURG, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter v. PCM, LLC d/b/a Postcard Mania
as 8:2025cv00331
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carter
Defendant:
PCM, LLC d/b/a Postcard Mania
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carter v. USA
as 3:2025cv00107
Petitioner:
Christopher Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
