Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cisco v. Johnson
as 2:2025cv02123
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Chad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Splant et al
as 2:2025cv02091
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Kelly Splant, Andrew L Killian, Matthew Fitton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. The People of the State of Illinois
as 2:2025cv02032
Petitioner:
Christopher Cisco
Respondent:
The People of the State of Illinois
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisco v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 4:2025cv00088
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Cisco v. Killian
as 2:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Andrew Killian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Cisco v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
John Doe, Office of the Inspector General, Lisa Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Killian et al
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Andrew Killian and Matthew Fitton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Zureck et al
as 0:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Judith P. Zureck, Vatican, The and Saint Meinrad Archabbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
People of the State of Illinois v. Christopher Cisco
as 24-1160
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
