Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CONELY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16633
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONELY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CONELY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06662
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONELY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cone v. City of Duluth et al
as 0:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cone, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Duluth and Matt McShane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONELY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03819
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMMOND et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00739
Plaintiff:
JASON FRAHN, SOCORRO CHRIS HERNANDEZ, STEPHEN THARP and others
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Hammond et al v. 3M Company et al
as 8:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jason Frahn, Stephen Tharp, Matthew Dominic Fox and others
Defendant:
om 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cone v. Medical Imaging Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cone
Defendant:
Medical Imaging Holdings, Inc. , Consensys Imaging Service, Inc. , Galen Partners IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Boone v. Randal Nichols, et al
as 12-30389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDAL NICHOLS, WILLIE LANE, ERIC COUNTS and others
Boone v. Nicholes et al
as 2:2012cv00150
Defendant:
Randal Nicholes, Willie Lane, Eric Champes and others
Plaintiff:
James M Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
