Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Christopher Jones v. Brian Foster
as 16-1464
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN FOSTER, Warden
Jones et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Jones and Jennifer F. Jones
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , The Bank of New York Mellon , Recontrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Pollard
as 2:2012cv01108
Petitioner:
Christopher D Jones
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polley et al v. Muscletech Research and Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
Steven D Polley , Christopher D Jones , Dasha Kadulova and others
Defendant:
Muscletech Research and Development, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Research, Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
John K. Trotter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Polley et al v. Muscletech Research and Development, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01239
Plaintiff:
Steven D Polley , Christopher D Jones , Dasha Kadulova and others
Defendant:
Muscletech Research and Development, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences USA, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Research, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. USA
as 4:2010cv02091
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopher Jones v. PA Bd Probation and Parole, et al
as 10-2944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PA BD PROBATION AND PAROLE, PA DEPT CORR and COMM OF PA
USA v. Christopher Jone
as 08-2483
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. JONES
JONES v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2007cv00207
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER D JONES
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
