Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hartley v. Tubbs et al
as 5:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hartley
Defendant:
Cheyenne Tubbs, Scott Burgess, Ian Druce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Hartley et al
as 2:2023cv03954
Plaintiff:
Miciah Black
Defendant:
Christopher Hartley and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Miciah Black
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Correctional Officer Christopher Hartley and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hebbe et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Plaintiff:
Herman Hebbe , Agatha Hebbe , Steven Emert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hebbe et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as TXW/1:17-cv-01205
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Plaintiff:
Herman Hebbe , Agatha Hebbe , Steven Emert and others
Hebbe et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01205
Plaintiff:
Steven Emert, Dennis Emett, Douglas Evans and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lluberes, et al v. Uncommon Productions, LLC, et al
as 10-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE VICINI LLUBERES and JUAN VICINI LLUBERES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNCOMMON PRODUCTIONS, LLC and WILLIAM M. HANEY, III
Interested Party:
CHRISTOPHER HARTLEY
FATHER CHRISTOPHER HARTLEY v. LLUBERES et al
as 1:2008mc00010
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HARTLEY
Respondent:
FELIPE VICINI LLUBERES and JUAN VICINI LLUBERES
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
