Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Synovus Bank v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Synovus Bank
Defendant:
Christopher L. Brown, Darryl A.R. Brown, Barto C. Robinson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wildman v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
as 23-132
Plaintiff:
Adam Daehling, Samantha Daehling, G. F., by and through his next friend Erica Fox and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jonathan L. Ashley, III, Jonathan Leigh Ashley, IV, Jordan T. Ashley and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Standard Chartered Bank and others
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank UK, Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch, Standard Chartered Bank Limited and others
Petitioner:
Diana Bonacasa, Vincent Bonacasa, Raquel Bonacasa and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Institute of International Bankers, American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute and others
Brown v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02141
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Brown
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Major McRae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. FCI-Yazoo City Medium Warden
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Brown
Defendant:
FCI-Yazoo City Medium Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wildman et v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
as 1:2021cv04400
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Ashley, III, Jonathan Leigh Ashley, IV, Jordan T. Ashley and others
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Deutsche Bank UK, Deutsche Bank AG, Dubai Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Brown v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021hc02048
Petitioner:
Christopher L. Brown
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Major Susan Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
