Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Michigan, State of et al v. De Leon
as 1:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Michigan, State of, Michigan State Police, Wyoming, City of and others
Counter Defendant:
Kent, County of, Jessica Hemingway, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1 and others
Counter Claimant:
Thomas Joseph De Leon, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Hill v. Trusock et al
as 2:2023cv12514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee-Leo Hill
Defendant:
Mark A. Trusock and Christopher R. Becker
Frederick Stampone v. Michelle LaJoye-Young, et al
as 22-1464
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE LAJOYE-YOUNG, Sheriff, KENT CIRCUIT JUDGE CURT A. BENSON, CHRISTOPHER R. BECKER, Prosecutor and others
Stacey Smith v. Bridget McCormack, et al
as 21-2775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY R. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DEF BRIDGET MARY MCCORMACK, Chief Justice Michigan Supreme Court, MARK A. TRUSOCK, Chief Judge of the 17th Judicial Circuit Court, CHRISTOPHER R. BECKER, prosecutor, County of Kent, MI and others
Smith v. McCormack et al
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Mark A. Trusock, John R. Beason, Christopher R. Becker and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Figures #538444 v. Becker et al
as 1:2020cv00909
Defendant:
Ryan Maesen, Christopher R. Becker, Case Weston and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Figures #538444, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Connor v. Becker et al
as 2:2008cv13870
Plaintiff:
Trevor O'Connor
Defendant:
Christopher R Becker, Roman Skypakewych, Donald C Pebley and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
