Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Thompson et al v. Thompson
as 2:2023cv12867
Plaintiff:
Christine Thompson and Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Thompson and Zanita Clipper
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Robinson
as 22-2820
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Robinson, AKA G
USA v. Christopher Robinson
as 21-1605
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON
Robinson v. Morton
as 21-2075
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Morton
Rose Karam v. University of Arizona, et al
as 20-15099
Defendant:
SUZANNE TOYAMA-BODNAR, DAVID LEE, THAO TRUONG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, GENOA HEALTHCARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ANN KARAM
In re: Sean Hartranft v. Midland Funding, LLC, et al
as 19-56390
Defendant / Appellee:
MRC RECEIVABLES, ATLANTIC CREDIT AND FINANCE, INC., GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Plaintiff:
LAVANCHY JOHNSON, RICHARD RAMCHARITAR, RUTH MOYA and others
US v. Christopher Robinson
as 19-7565
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON, a/k/a S-Dot
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hettema et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
as 3:2018cv06132
Defendant:
USCIS Field Office Director, USCIS, DHS and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hettema and Ahu Hettema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Robinson v. Couch Conville & Blitt L L C
as 5:2017mc00176
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Couch Conville & Blitt L L C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
