Cases 31 - 40 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
DOUTT v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2023cv01859
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT and JOSHUA L. DOUTT
Respondent:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. TCR2 Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03763
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
TCR2 Therapeutics Inc., Andrew Allen, Ansbert Gadicke and others
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
DeMarius Walker
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Thompson and Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Christopher Scott Reeder
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Evans
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Officer Hammond, Officer Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Nurse Lydia et al
as 8:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Henry
Defendant:
Nurse Lydia, Nurse Tamara, Nurse Brittany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
RAYA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05307
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT RAYA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BATEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05287
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BATEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jack Christopher Scott, II
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
