Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Christopher Henry v. Nurse Lydia
as 24-6438
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HENRY, a/k/a Chicken Man
Defendant:
NURSE LYDIA, NURSE TAMARA, NURSE BRITTANY and others
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio v. Barksdale
as 1:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Defendant:
Christopher Scott Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Southern v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Southern
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Scott v. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., Peter Cannito, Sean Battle and others
Scott v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Rhodes v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Rhodes, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Scott v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., William Staples, Lewis Cirne and others
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30800
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
