Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hutchins v. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2026cv02600
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Hutchins
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Tyler Pierre, Deputy Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andersen v. Scott et al
as 2:2026cv02210
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Andersen
Defendant:
Christopher Scott and Comp Out
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Christopher BarksdaleIn re: Christopher Barksdale
as 26-3644
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BARKSDALE
Sommerhauser v. Scott et al
as 0:2026cv03110
Plaintiff:
Grant Sommerhauser
Defendant:
Christopher Scott and Century Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sommerhauser v. Scott et al
as 0:2026cv03109
Plaintiff:
Grant Sommerhauser
Defendant:
Christopher Scott and Meadowbrook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Christopher Payne et al v. Frank Jesus Alvaro Jr et al
as 2:2026cv06287
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Payne and Andrew Ibarra
Defendant:
Frank Jesus Alvaro, Jr and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sheehan v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv00744
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Sheehan
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Mullin v. White
as 1:2026cv02543
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Mullin
Defendant:
Officer White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRON v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv00671
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BYRON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
