Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (findings & purpose)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Brown
as 23-10108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Stephen Brown, also known as Madrikh Obadiah
USA v. Christopher Martin
as 19-11089
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN MARTIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Christopher Martin
as 15-10728
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN MARTIN
United States of America v. Velez (Correa)
as 14-1149
Defendant:
Kenneth Arce, AKA Kenny, Amber Calvo, Marianito Lopez, AKA Powie, AKA Bowie, AKA Bow Wow, AKA Pow Wow and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Miguel Correa, AKA Miguel Negron, AKA Mikey, AKA Jose Negron
United States of America v. Velez (Correa)
as 14-1149
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmen Velez, AKA Edrik, Wilberto Huertas, Richard Crespo, AKA Richie and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Miguel Correa, AKA Miguel Negron, AKA Mikey, AKA Jose Negron
United States of America v. Velez (Williams)
as 10-2716
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmen Velez, AKA Edrik, Wilberto Huertas, AKA Tito, Richard Crespo, AKA Richie and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rodney Williams, AKA Rod
US v. Christopher Goin
as 08-4618
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN GOIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
