Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Morris Sr. v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Mary K. Huffman, David Merrell, Christopher Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. Merchandising Solutions Group, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05313
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson and Lauren Thompson
Defendant:
Merchandising Solutions Group, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv62471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2021cv03982
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thompson
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Thompson v. University of Arkansas Brd of Trustees, et al
as 21-3376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Thompson
Defendant / Appellee:
University of Arkansas Board of Trustees, also known as University of Arkansas at Fort Smith and Raymond Ottmann, Individually and in his official capacity
THOMPSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67723
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
