Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anthony Scocozzo v. Sheriff, Baker County, et al
as 26-11893
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
SHERIFF, BAKER COUNTY, DEPUTY THOMAS DYAL, JR., SERGEANT TYLER BALDWYN and others
Scocozzo v. Dyal et al
as 3:2026cv00592
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO
Defendant:
THOMAS DYAL, JR., TYLER BALDWYN, BRAD DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scocozzo v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2026cv00267
Defendant:
Detective Rebecca Parker, Sheriff Scott Rhoden, Deputy Thomas Dyal, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scocozzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Walker
as 26-5062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WALKER
Ross v. Walker
as 25-60606
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Ross
Defendant:
James Christopher Walker, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chancellor for Holmes and Madison Counties
Doll et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as SC/2:25-cv-11850
Plaintiff:
Branch Doll, Andrew Donlon, Pamela Doss and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Dobson v. Crawford, et al.
as 25-5541
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON, an individual
Defendant:
DARREN CRAWFORD, an individual and CHRISTOPHER WALKER, an individual
Doll et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11850
Plaintiff:
Branch Doll, Andrew Donlon, Pamela Doss and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Boykin (McLean)
as 25-1986
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOYKIN, PAUL ARLINE, JOSEPH MCLEAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dobson v. Walker, et al.
as 25-5171
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WALKER, an individual and DARREN CRAWFORD, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
