Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08857
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richard Barlow v. Clarence White
as 22-6304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD LARUE BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARENCE WHITE, Institutional Program Manager, St. Brides Correctional Center, DARA WATSON, Warden, St. Brides Correction Center and CHRISTOPHER WALTON, Offender Workforce Development Specialist, St. Brides Correctional Center, Individually and in their Official Capacity
WALTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20170
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Barlow et al
as 1:2020cv01458
Defendant:
Dara Watson, Christopher Walton and Clarence White
Plaintiff:
Richard LaRue Barlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Christopher Hopton v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16229
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WALTON HOPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Christopher Hopton v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-15281
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WALTON HOPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Walton v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00122
Petitioner:
Christopher Walton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2016mc00034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Walton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Walton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2016mc00018
Plaintiff:
Christopher Walton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
