Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Peerless Insurance Company vs Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 3:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Peerless Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. V Restaurant Group, LLC
as 2:2015cv00267
Defendant:
V Restaurant Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stuckey v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01060
Plaintiff:
Alex P. Stuckey, Jr.
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation and Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SHAPIRO et al v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 3:2012cv05939
Plaintiff:
BLANCHE G. SHAPIRO , EASECO, INC. and LEASE WEAR CORPORATION,
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Robert Smith Group Safety Professionals LLC
as 3:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Robert Smith Group Safety Professionals LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mid-Century Insurance Company as Subrogee of the Ezekiel Group, Inc. v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 1:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Mid-Century Insurance Company as Subrogee of the Ezekiel Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. PHI, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02576
Defendant:
PHI, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Superior Linen Supply Company v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 4:2007cv00217
Plaintiff:
The Superior Linen Supply Company
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2, Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation No. 2
Counter Claimant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation No. 2
Counter Defendant:
The Superior Linen Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
