Cases 81 - 90 of 732
Kelly et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05328
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Kelly and Mary A. Kelly
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB d/b/a Central Loan Administration & Reporting, CitiMortgage, Inc. and Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Scott
as 19-1701
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019at00541
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IMAGE MASTERS, INC. et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2019mc00131
Petitioner:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, SUNTRUST BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN FELDMAN
Defendant:
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
In Re:
IMAGE MASTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Ishutkina v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 19-1661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tatyana Ishutkina and Nikolay Synkov
Defendant / Appellee:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
US v. Scott
as 19-1506
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID SCOTT
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
SALEM FIVE CENT SAVINGS BANK and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv11491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1434
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 19-1113
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Kevin Dubay, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant / Appellee:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Watson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
