Cases 51 - 60 of 580
Yaroni v. Pintec Technology Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2020cv08062
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Pintec Technology Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Allon Yaroni
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Boluka Garment Co., Limited, et al v. Canaan, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07139
Defendant:
Qifeng Sun, Jianping Kong, China Renaissance Securities (Hong Kong) Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Boluka Garment Co., Limited, Phillippe Lemieux and Hongkou Tang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In re QUTOUTIAO, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2020cv06707
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Oliver Yucheng Chen, Jingbo Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Burnham
Lead Plaintiff:
James Pappas
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Howard Brown
Petitioner:
Robert Arredondo and Susan Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 20-1987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David Klusendorf, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Bank Dublin PLC, formerly known as Bear Stearns Bank PLC, Portigon/WestLB AG, Credit Suisse International and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BBA Libor, Ltd., Credit Suisse Group AG, Lloyds Bank PLC, FKA Lloyds TSB Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Lematta v. Casper Sleep, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02744
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEMATTA
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, JACK LAZAR, ANTHONY FLORENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
In Re Amtrust Financial Servic
as 20-1643
Defendant / Appellee:
BDO USA, LLP, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rubel, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and John Sachetti, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
New England Carpenters Guaranteed Annuity and Pension Funds, Stanley Newmark, Jupiter Capital Management and others
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute
Wandel v. Gao et al
as 1:2020cv03259
Defendant:
COGENCY GLOBAL INC., Gang Ji, Erhai Liu and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Wandel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant:
Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
