Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Geller v. Cuomo
as 20-2561
Defendant / Appellee:
Mayor Bill de Blasio, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor, City of New York, New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York and Commissioner Dermot Shea, individually and in his official capacity as the Police Commissioner, City of New York, New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Geller
Geller v. De Blasio
as 20-1592
Defendant / Appellee:
Dermot Shea, Individually and in his official capacity as the Police Commissioner of the City of New York, New York and Bill de Blasio, Individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, New York
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Geller
Amicus Curiae:
New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation
Radparvar v. Vitucci
as 19-4173
Defendant:
Ruben Martino, in his personal capacity, and professional capacity as Judge of the Family Court, Bronx County, Anne-Marie Jolley, in her personal capacity, and professional capacity as Family Court Judge, Bronx County, Harold Bahr, in his personal capacity, and professional capacity as Support Magistrate, Bronx County Family Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mehrak Radparvar and Hoshmand Radparvar
Defendant / Appellee:
Nicholas Wayne Vitucci
CITY OF NEWARK v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2019cv20931
Defendant:
Steven Banks, CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, Bill De Blasio and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, a Municipal Corporation and CITY OF NEWARK
Intervenor Plaintiff:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae:
MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
