Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2017op45032
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Dayton v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 3:2017cv00229
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma LP, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City Of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loudermilk v. Reese et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chad Loudermilk
Defendant:
Jessica Reece, City of Dayton Tennessee, Rhea County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fulcher v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 17-1460
Amicus Curiae:
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK, JOCELYN SAMUELS, NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
GIULIANO SILVA, DEE FULCHER and TRANSGENDER AMERICAN VETERANS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pate v. Dayton, Ohio
as 3:2016cv00475
Plaintiff:
Victor A Pate
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Rachel Shaw v. City of Dayton, et al
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL SHAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased, Kylen English
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DAYTON, OFFICER ALEX MAGILL and JOHN/JANE DOE, Supervisor(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
