Cases 11 - 20 of 71
McDaniel v. City of Hattiesburg Police Department
as 2:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Norman Gillis McDaniel
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Forrest County Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Lt. Dale Bounds, Officer Harry Crockett, Forrest County Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morris Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi
as 2:2020cv00158
Plaintiff:
State of Mississippi and United States of America
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey et al v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
R Bro Entertainment, LLC, Hebert Taylor Ramey and Charles Bradford Ramey
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Toby Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. County of Forrest et al
as 2:2020cv00088
Defendant:
County of Forrest, City of Hattiesburg, State of Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Alex-Wayne Duncan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Larry Barnes and City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. The City of Hattiesburg
as 2:2018cv00147
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg
Plaintiff:
Ladreco Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicht et al v. City of Hattiesburg
as 2:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ramona Lisa Wicht and Wade Wicht
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Lee v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Keith Lamont Lee
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg and Neil Rockhold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
